erosion: effect world

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.67
, process
Weight: 0.60
, concern
Weight: 0.59
, force
Weight: 0.59
, damage
Weight: 0.58
Siblings macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34
, decline
Weight: 0.34
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.34
, fragmentation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
effect world 1.00
be in world 0.78
be cause world 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(erosion, effect world)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(erosion, effect world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(problem, be in world)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(erosion, effect world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in world)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(erosion, effect world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(erosion, effect world)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(erosion, effect world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(erosion, effect world)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(erosion, effect world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(erosion, be in world)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(erosion, effect world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be in world)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(erosion, effect world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(erosion, be in world)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(erosion, effect world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(erosion, be cause world)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(erosion, effect world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(erosion, be in world)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(erosion, effect world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(erosion, effect world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(erosion, effect world)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(erosion, effect world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(erosion, effect world)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(erosion, effect world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(problem, be in world)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(erosion, effect world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(problem, be in world)