error: be squared in sum of errors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents omission
Weight: 0.63
, bug
Weight: 0.59
, problem
Weight: 0.58
, variation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mistake
Weight: 0.63
, slip
Weight: 0.61
, url
Weight: 0.59
, sin
Weight: 0.59
, ballot
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be squared in sum of errors 1.00
be squared in sum of squared errors 0.98
be squared in sum 0.89
is squared 0.78
be poor explanation for error 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(sin, is squared)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(sin, is squared) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(sin, is squared)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(error, be squared in sum of errors)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(error, be squared in sum)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(error, be squared in sum)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(error, be squared in sum)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(error, be squared in sum)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(error, is squared)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(error, is squared)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(error, is squared)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(error, is squared)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(error, be poor explanation for error)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(error, be poor explanation for error)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(error, be poor explanation for error)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(error, be poor explanation for error)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(error, be squared in sum of errors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(error, be squared in sum of errors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(error, be squared in sum of errors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(sin, is squared)