error: be squared in sum of squared errors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents omission
Weight: 0.63
, bug
Weight: 0.59
, problem
Weight: 0.58
, variation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mistake
Weight: 0.63
, slip
Weight: 0.61
, url
Weight: 0.59
, sin
Weight: 0.59
, ballot
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be squared in sum of squared errors 1.00
be squared in sum of errors 0.98
be squared in sum 0.92
is squared 0.88
be squared in regression 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(sin, is squared)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(sin, is squared)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(sin, is squared)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(error, be squared in sum of errors)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(error, be squared in sum)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(error, be squared in sum)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(error, is squared)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(error, be squared in sum)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(error, is squared)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(error, be squared in sum of errors)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(error, is squared)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(error, be squared in sum)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(error, be squared in sum of errors)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(error, is squared)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(error, be squared in regression)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(error, be squared in sum of errors)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(error, be squared in regression)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(error, be squared in regression)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(error, be squared in regression)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(error, be squared in sum of squared errors)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(sin, is squared)