escalator: be at department store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.55
, machine
Weight: 0.51
, system
Weight: 0.50
, word
Weight: 0.49
, area
Weight: 0.48
Siblings plane ticket
Weight: 0.32
, train ticket
Weight: 0.31
, staircase
Weight: 0.31
, stairwell
Weight: 0.31
, tram
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at department store 1.00
be used to department store 0.99
be at store 0.88
be used to store 0.86
be at computer store 0.80
be buy at store 0.80
be at it shop 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(system, be used to store)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(escalator, be at department store)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(system, be at it shop)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(escalator, be at department store)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(system, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(escalator, be at department store)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(thing, be buy at store)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(escalator, be at department store)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(thing, be buy at store)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(system, be at computer store)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(system, be used to store)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(system, be at it shop)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(system, be used to store)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(system, be at computer store)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(thing, be buy at store)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(system, be at it shop)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(system, be used to store)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(escalator, be at department store)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(system, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(escalator, be at department store)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(thing, be buy at store)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(escalator, be at department store)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(system, be at it shop)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(escalator, be at department store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(escalator, be at department store)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(escalator, be used to department store)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(escalator, be used to department store)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(escalator, be used to department store)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(escalator, be used to department store)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(escalator, be at store)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(escalator, be at store)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(escalator, be at store)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(escalator, be at store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(escalator, be at department store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(escalator, be at department store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(system, be used to store)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(system, be at it shop)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(system, be at computer store)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(thing, be buy at store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(system, be used to store)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(system, be at it shop)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(system, be at computer store)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(escalator, be at department store)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(thing, be buy at store)