esophagus: is retroperitoneal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mucous membrane
Weight: 0.66
, digestive system
Weight: 0.60
, organ
Weight: 0.57
, alimentary canal
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.55
Siblings small intestine
Weight: 0.36
, lung
Weight: 0.35
, irritable bowel syndrome
Weight: 0.35
, rectum
Weight: 0.35
, intestine
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is retroperitoneal 1.00
is vascularized 0.82
have stratified squamous epithelium 0.82
has state varices 0.80
be lined with stratified squamous epithelium 0.80
be clear in cardiac tamponade 0.79
be lined with squamous epithelium 0.79
is squamous 0.79
is highly vascularized 0.79
have stratified epithelium 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(esophagus, is squamous)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(esophagus, is squamous)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has state varices)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, be lined with stratified squamous epithelium)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, be lined with squamous epithelium)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(esophagus, is squamous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, have stratified squamous epithelium)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(esophagus, has state varices)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, have stratified epithelium)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(esophagus, be lined with squamous epithelium)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(esophagus, be lined with stratified squamous epithelium)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(esophagus, has state varices)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(esophagus, have stratified squamous epithelium)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(esophagus, have stratified epithelium)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, is squamous)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(esophagus, be lined with squamous epithelium)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(esophagus, has state varices)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(esophagus, be lined with stratified squamous epithelium)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(esophagus, have stratified epithelium)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(esophagus, have stratified squamous epithelium)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(esophagus, have stratified epithelium)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(esophagus, be lined with squamous epithelium)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(esophagus, be lined with stratified squamous epithelium)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(esophagus, have stratified squamous epithelium)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)