esophagus: is squamous

Property	Similarity
is squamous	1.00
is stratified squamous	0.90
have stratified squamous epithelium	0.90
be lined with squamous epithelium	0.90
be lined with stratified squamous epithelium	0.88
is retroperitoneal	0.79
have stratified epithelium	0.78
has state varices	0.78
have columnar epithelium	0.77
have simple columnar epithelium	0.77

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(esophagus, be lined with squamous epithelium)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(esophagus, have stratified squamous epithelium)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(esophagus, be lined with stratified squamous epithelium)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(esophagus, is stratified squamous)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(esophagus, has state varices)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.95

Remarkable(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(esophagus, have stratified epithelium)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(esophagus, is stratified squamous)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(esophagus, is stratified squamous)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(esophagus, is stratified squamous)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(esophagus, be lined with squamous epithelium)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(esophagus, has state varices)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(esophagus, be lined with stratified squamous epithelium)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(esophagus, have stratified squamous epithelium)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(esophagus, have stratified epithelium)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(esophagus, has state varices)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(esophagus, be lined with squamous epithelium)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(esophagus, be lined with stratified squamous epithelium)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(esophagus, is retroperitoneal)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(esophagus, have stratified epithelium)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(esophagus, have stratified squamous epithelium)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(esophagus, has state varices)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(esophagus, be lined with squamous epithelium)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(esophagus, have stratified epithelium)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(esophagus, be lined with stratified squamous epithelium)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(esophagus, is squamous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(esophagus, have stratified squamous epithelium)

Parents	mucous membrane Weight: 0.66 , digestive system Weight: 0.60 , organ Weight: 0.57 , alimentary canal Weight: 0.55 , condition Weight: 0.55
Siblings	small intestine Weight: 0.36 , lung Weight: 0.35 , irritable bowel syndrome Weight: 0.35 , rectum Weight: 0.35 , intestine Weight: 0.35

esophagus: is squamous

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings