estuary: is economically important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.66
, area
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.60
, wetland
Weight: 0.58
, shallow water
Weight: 0.54
Siblings chesapeake bay
Weight: 0.72
, bay
Weight: 0.66
, shoreline
Weight: 0.36
, marsh
Weight: 0.36
, coral reef
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is economically important 1.00
be important to environment 0.77
is biologically important 0.76
is productive environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(wetland, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(estuary, is economically important)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(estuary, is economically important)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(estuary, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(wetland, is economically important)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(estuary, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important to environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(estuary, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(wetland, is economically important)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(estuary, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(wetland, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(estuary, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(estuary, is economically important)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ecosystem, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(estuary, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(estuary, is economically important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(estuary, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(estuary, is economically important)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(estuary, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(estuary, be important to environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(estuary, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(estuary, be important to environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(estuary, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(estuary, is biologically important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(estuary, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(estuary, be important to environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(estuary, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(estuary, is biologically important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(estuary, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(estuary, is biologically important)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(estuary, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(estuary, is biologically important)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(estuary, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(estuary, be important to environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(estuary, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(estuary, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(estuary, is economically important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(estuary, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(estuary, is economically important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(estuary, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to environment)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(estuary, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wetland, is economically important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(estuary, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wetland, is economically important)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(estuary, is economically important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to environment)