eth: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.31
, theory
Weight: 0.26
Siblings cpu
Weight: 0.26
, o
Weight: 0.25
, parameter
Weight: 0.25
, pc
Weight: 0.25
, ra
Weight: 0.25

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is zurich good 0.87
has quality worth 0.85
has quality optimum 0.82
is great 0.81
has quality shit 0.79
has quality joke 0.79
is bad 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(eth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pc, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(eth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(pc, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(pc, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(eth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(eth, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(eth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(eth, is zurich good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(eth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(eth, has quality worth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(eth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(eth, has quality worth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(eth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(eth, is zurich good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(eth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(eth, is zurich good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(eth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(eth, is zurich good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(eth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(eth, has quality worth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(eth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(eth, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(eth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(eth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(eth, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(eth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(eth, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(eth, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pc, has quality better)