eth: is zurich good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.31
, theory
Weight: 0.26
Siblings cpu
Weight: 0.26
, o
Weight: 0.25
, parameter
Weight: 0.25
, pc
Weight: 0.25
, ra
Weight: 0.25

Related properties

Property Similarity
is zurich good 1.00
is great 0.88
is bad 0.88
has quality good 0.87
has quality bad 0.83
is strong now 0.82
is strong 0.79
has quality better 0.79
be considered better 0.79
is hard 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(eth, is zurich good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(ra, is strong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(eth, is zurich good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pc, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(eth, is zurich good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ra, is strong now)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(eth, is zurich good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(ra, is strong now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(ra, is strong now)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(eth, is zurich good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(ra, is strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ra, is strong)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(eth, is zurich good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(pc, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(pc, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(eth, is zurich good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(eth, is zurich good)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(eth, is zurich good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(eth, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(eth, is zurich good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(eth, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(eth, is zurich good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(eth, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(eth, is zurich good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(eth, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(eth, is zurich good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(eth, is zurich good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(eth, is zurich good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(eth, is zurich good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(eth, is zurich good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(eth, is zurich good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(ra, is strong now)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(eth, is zurich good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(ra, is strong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(eth, is zurich good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pc, has quality better)