eth: is valuable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.31
, theory
Weight: 0.26
Siblings cpu
Weight: 0.26
, o
Weight: 0.25
, parameter
Weight: 0.25
, pc
Weight: 0.25
, ra
Weight: 0.25

Related properties

Property Similarity
is valuable 1.00
be less valuable again than btc 0.85
is useful 0.83
be useful 0.83
be important counselling 0.81
be important to geoligists 0.81
be useful in field 0.78
is helpful 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(theory, be important counselling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(eth, is valuable)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(eth, is valuable)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(theory, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(eth, is valuable)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(factor, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(eth, is valuable)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(theory, is useful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(factor, be useful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(theory, be important counselling)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important counselling)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(factor, be useful)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(theory, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(parameter, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(theory, be important counselling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(eth, is valuable)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(eth, is valuable)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(theory, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(eth, is valuable)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(factor, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(eth, is valuable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(parameter, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(parameter, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(eth, is valuable)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(eth, be less valuable again than btc)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(eth, be less valuable again than btc)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(eth, be less valuable again than btc)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(eth, be less valuable again than btc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eth, is valuable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(eth, is valuable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(factor, be useful)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(theory, is useful)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important counselling)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(parameter, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(theory, is useful)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(factor, be useful)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(eth, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important counselling)