theory: be important to geoligists

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents explanation
Weight: 0.71
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, model
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.63
Siblings string theory
Weight: 0.75
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.75
, relativity
Weight: 0.72
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.71
, constructivism
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important counselling 1.00
be important to geoligists 1.00
be important in work 0.90
have important development 0.82
be important in health 0.81
be important in education 0.79
be important in social work 0.79
be most important thing in science 0.79
be important in research 0.78
be important to science 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(explanation, be important to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(theory, be important to geoligists)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(theory, be important counselling)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important counselling)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(theory, be important counselling)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(theory, have important development)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, have important development)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important counselling)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(theory, be important in education)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(theory, be important in social work)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(theory, be most important thing in science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important in education)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(theory, be important in social work)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be most important thing in science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(theory, be important in research)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(theory, have important development)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important in research)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(theory, be important to science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in social work)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in education)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(theory, be most important thing in science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in research)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(theory, be important to science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(theory, have important development)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in education)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in social work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(theory, be most important thing in science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in research)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to geoligists)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(explanation, be important to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(explanation, be important to science)