theory: be important in research

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents explanation
Weight: 0.71
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, model
Weight: 0.63
, element
Weight: 0.63
Siblings string theory
Weight: 0.75
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.75
, relativity
Weight: 0.72
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.71
, constructivism
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in research 1.00
be important to science 0.82
have important development 0.80
be important in work 0.79
be important counselling 0.78
be important to geoligists 0.78
be most important thing in science 0.78
be important in sciences 0.77
be relevant in science 0.77
be important in educational management 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important in research)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(explanation, be important to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in research)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(theory, be important in research)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(theory, be important to science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(theory, have important development)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, have important development)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(theory, be important to science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(theory, be important counselling)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(theory, be most important thing in science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important counselling)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be most important thing in science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(theory, have important development)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(theory, be important in educational management)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important in educational management)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(theory, be important counselling)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(theory, be most important thing in science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in educational management)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(theory, have important development)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important counselling)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in educational management)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to geoligists)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(theory, be most important thing in science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in research)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important in research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(explanation, be important to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(explanation, be important to science)