explanation: be important to science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents answer
Weight: 0.69
, description
Weight: 0.64
, reference
Weight: 0.64
, consequence
Weight: 0.63
Siblings theory
Weight: 0.71
, excuse
Weight: 0.71
, detail
Weight: 0.63
, information
Weight: 0.60
, question
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to science 1.00
be crucial in science 0.92
be important in teaching 0.79
be in physics 0.77
help further science investigations 0.76
be in science tentative 0.76
be key element of economics 0.76
be important in public health 0.75
be used in scientific papers 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(reference, be used in scientific papers)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(explanation, be important to science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(reference, be used in scientific papers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(reference, be used in scientific papers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to science)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in public health)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(question, help further science investigations)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in teaching)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(reference, be used in scientific papers)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(explanation, be important to science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(theory, be important to science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(question, be important in teaching)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(question, be important in teaching)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(question, help further science investigations)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(question, help further science investigations)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(theory, be important in public health)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in public health)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(explanation, be important to science)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(explanation, be crucial in science)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(explanation, be crucial in science)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(explanation, be crucial in science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(explanation, be important in teaching)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(explanation, be important in teaching)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be crucial in science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(explanation, be in science tentative)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(explanation, be key element of economics)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(explanation, be important in teaching)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(explanation, be in science tentative)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(explanation, be key element of economics)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(explanation, be in science tentative)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(explanation, be key element of economics)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be in science tentative)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important in teaching)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be key element of economics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(explanation, be important to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(reference, be used in scientific papers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(question, be important in teaching)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(theory, be important in public health)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(question, help further science investigations)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(explanation, be important to science)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(reference, be used in scientific papers)