explanation: be key element of economics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents answer
Weight: 0.69
, description
Weight: 0.64
, reference
Weight: 0.64
, consequence
Weight: 0.63
Siblings theory
Weight: 0.71
, excuse
Weight: 0.71
, detail
Weight: 0.63
, information
Weight: 0.60
, question
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be key element of economics 1.00
be crucial in science 0.79
be important to science 0.76
be important to business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be key element of economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(explanation, be key element of economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(theory, be important to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(explanation, be key element of economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(explanation, be key element of economics)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(explanation, be key element of economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be crucial in science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(explanation, be key element of economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(explanation, be crucial in science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(explanation, be key element of economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(explanation, be key element of economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(explanation, be important to science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(explanation, be key element of economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(explanation, be crucial in science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(explanation, be key element of economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(explanation, be crucial in science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(explanation, be key element of economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(explanation, be important to science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(explanation, be key element of economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(explanation, be important to science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(explanation, be key element of economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(explanation, be key element of economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be key element of economics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(explanation, be key element of economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(explanation, be key element of economics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be key element of economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to science)