explanation: be important in teaching

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents answer
Weight: 0.69
, description
Weight: 0.64
, reference
Weight: 0.64
, consequence
Weight: 0.63
Siblings theory
Weight: 0.71
, excuse
Weight: 0.71
, detail
Weight: 0.63
, information
Weight: 0.60
, question
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in teaching 1.00
be important to science 0.79
be important in work practice 0.77
be crucial in science 0.76
be important in social work 0.76
be powerful tool for coaching 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in teaching)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in social work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(question, be powerful tool for coaching)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(question, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(question, be important in teaching)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(theory, be important to science)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(question, be powerful tool for coaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(question, be powerful tool for coaching)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(theory, be important in social work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in social work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(explanation, be important in teaching)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(explanation, be important to science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(explanation, be crucial in science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be crucial in science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important to science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(explanation, be crucial in science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(explanation, be important to science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(explanation, be important to science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(explanation, be crucial in science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important in teaching)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(explanation, be important in teaching)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(question, be important in teaching)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(question, be powerful tool for coaching)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(theory, be important in social work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(explanation, be important in teaching) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important to science)