ethics: be important in leadership

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.57
, journal
Weight: 0.57
, course
Weight: 0.54
, committee
Weight: 0.53
, book
Weight: 0.50
Siblings commission
Weight: 0.32
, theology
Weight: 0.32
, science fiction
Weight: 0.32
, political ideology
Weight: 0.31
, senate
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in leadership 1.00
be important to organization 0.77
be important to experience 0.77
be important in communication 0.76
be important in business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be important in leadership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(commission, be important in business)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be important in leadership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(theology, be important to experience)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(ethics, be important in leadership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(theology, be important to experience) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(theology, be important to experience)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(ethics, be important in leadership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(commission, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(commission, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(ethics, be important in leadership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ethics, be important in leadership)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(ethics, be important in leadership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(ethics, be important to organization)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ethics, be important in leadership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be important to organization)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ethics, be important in leadership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be important in business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(ethics, be important in leadership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(ethics, be important in business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(ethics, be important in leadership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(ethics, be important to organization)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(ethics, be important in leadership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ethics, be important in business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(ethics, be important in leadership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ethics, be important to organization)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(ethics, be important in leadership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ethics, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(ethics, be important in leadership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(ethics, be important in leadership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be important in leadership)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(ethics, be important in leadership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(ethics, be important in leadership)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be important in leadership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(theology, be important to experience)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be important in leadership) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(commission, be important in business)