evil: be defined as opposite of nice

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.61
, movie
Weight: 0.58
, symbol
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, matter
Weight: 0.56
Siblings israel
Weight: 0.64
, bigotry
Weight: 0.63
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.61
, injustice
Weight: 0.57
, lust
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be defined as opposite of nice 1.00
be defined as opposite of good 0.96
be good 0.78
be really cool 0.76
wants to understand something good 0.75
do not work well 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, do not work well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(evil, be defined as opposite of nice)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(evil, be defined as opposite of nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(thing, do not work well)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(evil, be defined as opposite of nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(thing, do not work well)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(evil, be defined as opposite of nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(lust, wants to understand something good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, do not work well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(evil, be defined as opposite of nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(evil, be defined as opposite of nice)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(evil, be defined as opposite of nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(lust, wants to understand something good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lust, wants to understand something good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(evil, be defined as opposite of nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(evil, be defined as opposite of nice)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(evil, be defined as opposite of nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(evil, be defined as opposite of good)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(evil, be defined as opposite of nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(evil, be defined as opposite of good)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(evil, be defined as opposite of nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(evil, be defined as opposite of good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(evil, be defined as opposite of nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(evil, be defined as opposite of good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(evil, be defined as opposite of nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(evil, be good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(evil, be defined as opposite of nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(evil, be good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(evil, be defined as opposite of nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(evil, be good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(evil, be defined as opposite of nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(evil, be good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(evil, be defined as opposite of nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(evil, be defined as opposite of nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(evil, be defined as opposite of nice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(evil, be defined as opposite of nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(evil, be defined as opposite of nice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(evil, be defined as opposite of nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(evil, be defined as opposite of nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(lust, wants to understand something good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(evil, be defined as opposite of nice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)