examples: be good way develop

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents example
Weight: 0.51
, website
Weight: 0.30
, information
Weight: 0.28
, compound
Weight: 0.25
Siblings instance
Weight: 0.32
, model
Weight: 0.30
, opportunity
Weight: 0.30
, piece
Weight: 0.29
, testament
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good way develop 1.00
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(examples, be good way develop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(examples, be good way develop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(piece, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(examples, be good way develop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(piece, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(piece, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(examples, be good way develop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(opportunity, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(examples, be good way develop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(examples, be good way develop)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(examples, be good way develop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(examples, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(examples, be good way develop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(examples, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(examples, be good way develop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(examples, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(examples, be good way develop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(examples, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(examples, be good way develop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(examples, be good way develop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(examples, be good way develop)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(examples, be good way develop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(examples, be good way develop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(examples, be good way develop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(opportunity, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(examples, be good way develop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(piece, has quality good)