opportunity: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	privilege Weight: 0.65 , example Weight: 0.64 , tool Weight: 0.64 , issue Weight: 0.61
Siblings	moment Weight: 0.65 , challenge Weight: 0.65 , avenue Weight: 0.64 , advantage Weight: 0.64 , happy hour Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
has quality worth	0.85
has quality cost	0.82
is great	0.81
is best	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(opportunity, has quality good)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(tool, is great) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(opportunity, has quality good)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(tool, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(opportunity, has quality good)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(opportunity, has quality good)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(privilege, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(opportunity, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(tool, is great)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(tool, is best)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(tool, is great)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(tool, is best)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(challenge, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(advantage, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(opportunity, has quality good)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(tool, is great) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(opportunity, has quality good)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(opportunity, has quality good)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(tool, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(opportunity, has quality good)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(privilege, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(opportunity, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(challenge, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(challenge, has quality good)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(advantage, has quality worth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(advantage, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(opportunity, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(opportunity, has quality cost)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(opportunity, has quality cost)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(opportunity, has quality cost)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality cost)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(opportunity, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(privilege, has quality bad)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(tool, is great)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(tool, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(advantage, has quality worth)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(privilege, has quality bad)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(tool, is great)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(opportunity, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(tool, is best)