tool: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, mechanism
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
Siblings metaphor
Weight: 0.71
, task force
Weight: 0.69
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.69
, free software
Weight: 0.69
, calculator
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality good 0.85
has quality plus 0.83
has quality bad 0.82
add value to organisation 0.78
has quality system 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(resource, add value to organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gift, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(resource, add value to organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gift, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(resource, add value to organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(metaphor, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(metaphor, has quality worth)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality plus)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(mechanism, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(resource, add value to organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(metaphor, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(metaphor, has quality worth)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(metaphor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(metaphor, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(calculator, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(calculator, has quality plus)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(calculator, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(calculator, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(tool, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(tool, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(resource, add value to organisation)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(metaphor, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(metaphor, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(calculator, has quality plus)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(calculator, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(resource, add value to organisation)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mechanism, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)