privilege: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.61
, freedom
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, provision
Weight: 0.57
Siblings license
Weight: 0.67
, opportunity
Weight: 0.65
, liberty
Weight: 0.60
, status
Weight: 0.60
, recess
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality right 0.88
be be bad 0.86
has quality cost 0.81
has quality class 0.80
is bad thing 0.79
is terrible 0.77
be good for us 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(provision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(privilege, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(privilege, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(freedom, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(privilege, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(freedom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(privilege, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(freedom, be be bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(privilege, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(freedom, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(freedom, be be bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(freedom, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(provision, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(provision, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(freedom, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(freedom, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(freedom, be be bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(recess, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(recess, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(recess, has quality better)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(opportunity, has quality cost)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(status, has quality class)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(recess, is bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(provision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(freedom, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(freedom, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(freedom, be be bad)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(recess, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(recess, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(recess, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(recess, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(opportunity, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(opportunity, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(recess, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(recess, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(opportunity, has quality cost)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(opportunity, has quality cost)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(status, has quality class)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(status, has quality class)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(recess, be good for us)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(recess, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(recess, is bad thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(privilege, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(privilege, is bad thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(privilege, is bad thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, is bad thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(privilege, is bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(privilege, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(freedom, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(provision, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(freedom, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(provision, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(freedom, be be bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(recess, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(recess, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(opportunity, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(recess, has quality better)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(opportunity, has quality cost)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(status, has quality class)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(recess, is bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(recess, be good for us)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(freedom, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(freedom, be be bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(freedom, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(provision, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(provision, has quality good)