recess: be good for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents free time
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, period
Weight: 0.59
, privilege
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings holiday
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, lunch
Weight: 0.32
, homework
Weight: 0.31
, spending
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for us 1.00
is good thing 0.85
is bad thing 0.80
be good for children 0.80
has quality good 0.80
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(privilege, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(recess, be good for us)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(recess, be good for us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(privilege, is bad thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, is bad thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(privilege, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(holiday, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(lunch, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(homework, is good thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(homework, be good for children)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(spending, is good thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(spending, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(holiday, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(homework, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(homework, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(lunch, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(privilege, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(recess, be good for us)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(privilege, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(recess, be good for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(spending, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(spending, is good thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(homework, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(homework, is good thing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(lunch, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lunch, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(holiday, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(holiday, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(homework, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(homework, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(holiday, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(holiday, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(lunch, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(lunch, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(homework, be good for children)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(homework, be good for children)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(spending, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(spending, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(homework, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(homework, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(recess, be good for us)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(recess, is good thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for children)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(recess, be good for children)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(recess, be good for children)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(recess, is good thing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(recess, be good for children)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(recess, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(recess, is bad thing)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(recess, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(recess, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(recess, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(recess, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(recess, is bad thing)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(recess, is good thing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(recess, is bad thing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(recess, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(recess, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(recess, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(recess, is bad thing)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(recess, is good thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(recess, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(privilege, is bad thing)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(privilege, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(spending, is good thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(homework, is good thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(lunch, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(holiday, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lunch, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(holiday, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(spending, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(homework, be good for children)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(homework, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(homework, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(privilege, is bad thing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(recess, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(privilege, has quality bad)