spending: is good thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.66
, bill
Weight: 0.58
, behavior
Weight: 0.58
, policy
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.57
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.35
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.34
, dollar bill
Weight: 0.33
, consumption
Weight: 0.33
, appropriation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good thing 1.00
is thing 0.95
feel good 0.85
has trait fun 0.78
is one 0.75
has quality bad 0.75
is big 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(spending, is good thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(appropriation, is big)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(appropriation, is thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(spending, is good thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(appropriation, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(appropriation, is thing)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(appropriation, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(appropriation, is big)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(spending, is good thing)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(spending, is thing)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(spending, is thing)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(spending, is thing)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(spending, is thing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(spending, feel good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(spending, is one)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(spending, has trait fun)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(spending, is one)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(spending, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(spending, is big)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(spending, feel good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(spending, is one)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(spending, is one)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(spending, feel good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(spending, feel good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(spending, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(spending, has trait fun)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(spending, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(spending, is big)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(spending, has trait fun)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(spending, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(spending, has trait fun)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(spending, is big)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(spending, is big)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(spending, is good thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(spending, is good thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(appropriation, is thing)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(appropriation, is big)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(spending, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)