spending: feel good

Related concepts

Parents	activity Weight: 0.66 , bill Weight: 0.58 , behavior Weight: 0.58 , policy Weight: 0.57 , factor Weight: 0.57
Siblings	business activity Weight: 0.35 , sexual activity Weight: 0.34 , dollar bill Weight: 0.33 , consumption Weight: 0.33 , appropriation Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
feel good	1.00
is good thing	0.85
be good for economy	0.76
has quality bad	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(spending, feel good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(consumption, be good for economy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(spending, feel good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(consumption, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(consumption, be good for economy)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(spending, feel good)

Similarity expansion

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Typical(spending, is good thing)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(spending, is good thing)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(spending, has quality bad)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(spending, be good for economy)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(spending, is good thing)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(spending, is good thing)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(spending, has quality bad)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(spending, has quality bad)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(spending, be good for economy)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(spending, has quality bad)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(spending, be good for economy)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(spending, be good for economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(spending, feel good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(spending, feel good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(consumption, be good for economy)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(spending, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)