tool: is great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, mechanism
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.61
Siblings metaphor
Weight: 0.71
, task force
Weight: 0.69
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.69
, free software
Weight: 0.69
, calculator
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
is great 1.00
is ungiven good 0.88
is awesome 0.83
has quality good 0.81
is big 0.80
is best 0.78
be important for us 0.78
be important to us 0.77
be good for business 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is great)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is great)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gift, is ungiven good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gift, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gift, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, be good for business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(metaphor, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(tool, is great)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(tool, is great)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(metaphor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(metaphor, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(calculator, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(calculator, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(spreadsheet, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, be good for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(tool, is great)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(tool, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(tool, is best)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is best)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(tool, is best)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tool, is best)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, is great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(metaphor, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, be good for business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(calculator, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)