excavation: be at under grind

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents construction
Weight: 0.63
, operation
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, material
Weight: 0.56
Siblings pit
Weight: 0.58
, ore
Weight: 0.32
, gravel
Weight: 0.32
, iron ore
Weight: 0.32
, silt
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at under grind 1.00
be at grind 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(excavation, be at under grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pit, be at grind)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(excavation, be at under grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(pit, be at grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(pit, be at grind)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(excavation, be at under grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(excavation, be at under grind)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(excavation, be at under grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(excavation, be at under grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(excavation, be at under grind)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(excavation, be at under grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(excavation, be at under grind)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(excavation, be at under grind) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(pit, be at grind)