excess: be burden of taxation

Related concepts

Parents	amount Weight: 0.53 , factor Weight: 0.51 , vice Weight: 0.50 , insurance Weight: 0.49
Siblings	indulgence Weight: 0.51 , increase Weight: 0.31 , reduction Weight: 0.31 , decrease Weight: 0.31 , accumulation Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be burden of taxation	1.00
be in property taxes	0.80
be in property taxes paid	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(excess, be burden of taxation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(increase, be in property taxes paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(excess, be burden of taxation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(increase, be in property taxes paid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(increase, be in property taxes paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(excess, be burden of taxation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(excess, be burden of taxation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(excess, be burden of taxation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(excess, be burden of taxation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(excess, be burden of taxation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(excess, be burden of taxation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(excess, be burden of taxation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(excess, be burden of taxation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(increase, be in property taxes paid)