exchange: has quality significance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents transfer
Weight: 0.66
, financial institution
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, third party
Weight: 0.60
Siblings conversation
Weight: 0.62
, dialogue
Weight: 0.60
, option
Weight: 0.60
, stock market
Weight: 0.33
, bank statement
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality significance 1.00
be for importance 0.86
be for set importance 0.82
be for importance in outlook 0.79
be for set importance in outlook 0.78
have time value 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(exchange, has quality significance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(option, be for importance in outlook)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(exchange, has quality significance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(option, be for set importance in outlook)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(exchange, has quality significance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(option, be for set importance)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(exchange, has quality significance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(option, be for importance)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(exchange, has quality significance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(option, have time value)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(exchange, has quality significance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(option, be for importance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(option, be for importance)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(exchange, has quality significance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(option, be for set importance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(option, be for set importance)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(exchange, has quality significance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(option, have time value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(option, have time value)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(exchange, has quality significance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(option, be for set importance in outlook) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(option, be for set importance in outlook)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(exchange, has quality significance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(option, be for importance in outlook) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(option, be for importance in outlook)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(exchange, has quality significance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(exchange, has quality significance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(exchange, has quality significance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(exchange, has quality significance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(exchange, has quality significance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(exchange, has quality significance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(exchange, has quality significance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(exchange, has quality significance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(option, be for importance)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(exchange, has quality significance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(option, be for set importance)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(exchange, has quality significance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(option, have time value)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(exchange, has quality significance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(option, be for set importance in outlook)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(exchange, has quality significance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(option, be for importance in outlook)