option: be for set importance

Related concepts

Parents	solution Weight: 0.64 , consideration Weight: 0.63 , factor Weight: 0.61 , exchange Weight: 0.60
Siblings	stock option Weight: 0.85 , lock Weight: 0.68 , method Weight: 0.65 , pay Weight: 0.64 , time zone Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be for set importance	1.00
be for importance	0.95
be for set importance in outlook	0.89
be for importance in outlook	0.83
has quality significance	0.82
be for work important	0.77
be important to tobago	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(exchange, has quality significance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(option, be for set importance)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(exchange, be important to tobago) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(option, be for set importance)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(exchange, has quality significance)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(exchange, be important to tobago)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(exchange, be important to tobago)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(exchange, has quality significance)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(pay, be for work important)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(exchange, has quality significance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(option, be for set importance)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(exchange, be important to tobago) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(option, be for set importance)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(pay, be for work important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(pay, be for work important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(option, be for set importance)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(option, be for importance)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(option, be for importance)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(option, be for importance)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(option, be for set importance in outlook)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(option, be for set importance in outlook)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(option, be for importance)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(option, be for importance in outlook)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(option, be for set importance in outlook)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(option, be for importance in outlook)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(option, be for importance in outlook)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(option, be for set importance in outlook)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(option, be for importance in outlook)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(option, be for set importance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(option, be for set importance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(exchange, has quality significance)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(exchange, be important to tobago)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(pay, be for work important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(exchange, has quality significance)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(option, be for set importance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(exchange, be important to tobago)