excuse: is work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents explanation
Weight: 0.71
, lie
Weight: 0.61
, obstacle
Weight: 0.59
, answer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bad weather
Weight: 0.63
, insult
Weight: 0.55
, australia day
Weight: 0.50
, hungry
Weight: 0.35
, theory
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is work 1.00
work 0.98
be important in work 0.89
be used in work 0.87
do want work 0.83
be important in work practice 0.82
be important in social work practice 0.80
be important in social work 0.79
be used in social work 0.79
do want job 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(answer, do want job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(excuse, is work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(excuse, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(answer, do want job)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(excuse, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(answer, do want job)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(excuse, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(insult, work)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(excuse, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in social work practice)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(excuse, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in social work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(excuse, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be used in social work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(answer, do want job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(excuse, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(excuse, is work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(excuse, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(insult, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(insult, work)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(excuse, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be used in social work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(theory, be used in social work)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(excuse, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(theory, be important in social work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in social work)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(excuse, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(theory, be important in social work practice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in social work practice)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(excuse, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(excuse, is work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(excuse, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(excuse, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(excuse, is work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(excuse, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(excuse, is work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(excuse, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(answer, do want job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(excuse, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(insult, work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(excuse, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(theory, be used in social work)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(excuse, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(theory, be important in social work)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(excuse, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(theory, be important in social work practice)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(excuse, is work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(answer, do want job)