executive: be used to enforce law

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents officer
Weight: 0.72
, committee
Weight: 0.67
, authority
Weight: 0.61
, employee
Weight: 0.60
, professional
Weight: 0.58
Siblings director
Weight: 0.77
, president
Weight: 0.76
, manager
Weight: 0.65
, ceo
Weight: 0.61
, chairman
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to enforce law 1.00
comply with law 0.88
sign bill into law 0.79
veto law 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(executive, be used to enforce law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(manager, comply with law)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(executive, be used to enforce law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(president, veto law)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(executive, be used to enforce law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(president, sign bill into law)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(executive, be used to enforce law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(president, sign bill into law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(president, sign bill into law)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(executive, be used to enforce law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(president, veto law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(president, veto law)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(executive, be used to enforce law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(manager, comply with law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(manager, comply with law)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(executive, be used to enforce law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(executive, be used to enforce law)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(executive, be used to enforce law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(executive, be used to enforce law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(executive, be used to enforce law)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(executive, be used to enforce law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(executive, be used to enforce law)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(executive, be used to enforce law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(manager, comply with law)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(executive, be used to enforce law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(president, veto law)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(executive, be used to enforce law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(president, sign bill into law)