expansion: be important consideration for engineering

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.69
, construction
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, growth
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings construction site
Weight: 0.35
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34
, restoration
Weight: 0.33
, revision
Weight: 0.33
, consolidation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important consideration for engineering 1.00
be important for development meritnation 0.78
be important for development 0.78
be important in development 0.77
have impact on development 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development meritnation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(expansion, be important consideration for engineering)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(expansion, be important consideration for engineering)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(factor, have impact on development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(expansion, be important consideration for engineering)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(project, be important in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(expansion, be important consideration for engineering)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(project, be important in development)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(factor, have impact on development)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(issue, be important for development)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(issue, be important for development meritnation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important for development meritnation)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important for development)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, have impact on development)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(project, be important in development)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development meritnation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(expansion, be important consideration for engineering)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(expansion, be important consideration for engineering)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(project, be important in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(expansion, be important consideration for engineering)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(factor, have impact on development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(expansion, be important consideration for engineering)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(expansion, be important consideration for engineering)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be important consideration for engineering)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(expansion, be important consideration for engineering)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(project, be important in development)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(factor, have impact on development)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development meritnation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(project, be important in development)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(factor, have impact on development)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(expansion, be important consideration for engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development meritnation)