expatriate: is paid more

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.43
, citizen
Weight: 0.43
, worker
Weight: 0.42
, organization
Weight: 0.42
, country
Weight: 0.41
Siblings foreigner
Weight: 0.30
, construction worker
Weight: 0.30
, elderly person
Weight: 0.30
, young people
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid more 1.00
is paid 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(expatriate, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, is paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(expatriate, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(construction worker, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(construction worker, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(expatriate, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(expatriate, is paid more)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(expatriate, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(expatriate, is paid)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(expatriate, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(expatriate, is paid)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(expatriate, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(expatriate, is paid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(expatriate, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(expatriate, is paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(expatriate, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(expatriate, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(expatriate, is paid more)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(expatriate, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(expatriate, is paid more)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(expatriate, is paid more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(construction worker, is paid)