explosion: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accident
Weight: 0.74
, hazard
Weight: 0.64
, loud noise
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.61
Siblings blast
Weight: 0.65
, fire
Weight: 0.62
, grenade
Weight: 0.54
, gunfire
Weight: 0.51
, plane crash
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality change 0.86
be good for environment 0.75
has quality jokes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(loud noise, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(explosion, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(explosion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(loud noise, has quality jokes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(explosion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(loud noise, has quality jokes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(explosion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(grenade, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(explosion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fire, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(loud noise, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(explosion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(explosion, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(explosion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(grenade, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(grenade, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(explosion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(fire, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fire, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(explosion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(explosion, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(explosion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(explosion, has quality change)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(explosion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(explosion, has quality change)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(explosion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(explosion, has quality change)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(explosion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(explosion, has quality change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(explosion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(explosion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(explosion, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(explosion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(explosion, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(explosion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(loud noise, has quality jokes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(explosion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(grenade, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(explosion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fire, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(explosion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(loud noise, has quality jokes)