explosion: is underwater

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accident
Weight: 0.74
, hazard
Weight: 0.64
, loud noise
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.61
Siblings blast
Weight: 0.65
, fire
Weight: 0.62
, grenade
Weight: 0.54
, gunfire
Weight: 0.51
, plane crash
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is underwater 1.00
is dangerous underwater 0.94
is more dangerous underwater 0.93
is underwater damaging 0.87
is underwater more damaging 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(explosion, is underwater)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(explosion, is underwater)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(explosion, is underwater)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(explosion, is underwater)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(explosion, is dangerous underwater)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(explosion, is underwater)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(explosion, is underwater more damaging)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(explosion, is underwater)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(explosion, is underwater)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(explosion, is underwater more damaging)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(explosion, is underwater)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(explosion, is underwater)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(explosion, is underwater more damaging)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(explosion, is underwater)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(explosion, is dangerous underwater)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(explosion, is underwater)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(explosion, is underwater)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(explosion, is underwater more damaging)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(explosion, is underwater)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(explosion, is dangerous underwater)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(explosion, is underwater)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(explosion, is dangerous underwater)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(explosion, is underwater)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(explosion, is underwater)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(explosion, is underwater)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(explosion, is underwater)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(explosion, is underwater)