explosion: is more dangerous underwater

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accident
Weight: 0.74
, hazard
Weight: 0.64
, loud noise
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.61
Siblings blast
Weight: 0.65
, fire
Weight: 0.62
, grenade
Weight: 0.54
, gunfire
Weight: 0.51
, plane crash
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more dangerous underwater 1.00
is dangerous underwater 0.98
is underwater 0.93
is underwater more damaging 0.91
is underwater damaging 0.89
is dangerous 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(hazard, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(hazard, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hazard, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(grenade, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fire, is dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(hazard, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(fire, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(fire, is dangerous)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(grenade, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(grenade, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(explosion, is underwater)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(explosion, is underwater)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(explosion, is underwater)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(explosion, is dangerous underwater)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(explosion, is underwater)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(explosion, is underwater more damaging)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(explosion, is underwater more damaging)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(explosion, is underwater more damaging)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(explosion, is dangerous underwater)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(explosion, is underwater more damaging)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(explosion, is dangerous underwater)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(explosion, is dangerous underwater)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(explosion, is dangerous)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(explosion, is dangerous)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(explosion, is dangerous)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(explosion, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(hazard, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fire, is dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(grenade, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(explosion, is more dangerous underwater)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(hazard, is dangerous)