fabric: be insulator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.59
, layer
Weight: 0.57
, part
Weight: 0.57
Siblings silk
Weight: 0.71
, rayon
Weight: 0.70
, linen
Weight: 0.70
, wool
Weight: 0.70
, nylon
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be insulator 1.00
is insulator 1.00
be good insulator 0.98
is good insulator 0.98
is good insulators 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(wool, is good insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(wool, be good insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(silk, is good insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(nylon, is good insulator)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(nylon, is insulator)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(silk, be insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(silk, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(silk, be insulator)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(nylon, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nylon, is insulator)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(silk, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(silk, is good insulator)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(nylon, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(nylon, is good insulator)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(wool, be good insulator)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(wool, be good insulator)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(wool, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(wool, is good insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(fabric, be insulator)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(fabric, is insulator)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(fabric, be good insulator)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fabric, is good insulator)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(fabric, is insulator)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(fabric, is insulator)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(fabric, is good insulators)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(fabric, is insulator)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(fabric, be good insulator)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fabric, is good insulator)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(fabric, is good insulators)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fabric, be good insulator)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(fabric, is good insulator)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(fabric, is good insulators)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fabric, be good insulator)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fabric, is good insulator)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(fabric, is good insulators)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fabric, be insulator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fabric, be insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(silk, be insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(nylon, is insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(silk, is good insulator)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(nylon, is good insulator)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(wool, is good insulator)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fabric, be insulator)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(wool, be good insulator)