silk: be insulator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fabric
Weight: 0.71
, material
Weight: 0.64
, textile
Weight: 0.60
, commodity
Weight: 0.59
Siblings linen
Weight: 0.37
, velvet
Weight: 0.37
, rayon
Weight: 0.37
, cashmere
Weight: 0.37
, wool
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be insulator 1.00
is insulator 1.00
is good insulator 0.98
be better insulator than cotton 0.86
is insulators 0.85
is good insulators 0.84
is conductive 0.78
is polymer 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(fabric, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(silk, be insulator)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(fabric, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(silk, be insulator)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fabric, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(silk, be insulator)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fabric, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(silk, be insulator)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(fabric, is insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(fabric, be insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(fabric, is good insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(fabric, is good insulators)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(fabric, is good insulators)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fabric, is good insulator)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fabric, be insulator)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(fabric, is insulator)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(wool, is good insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(fabric, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(silk, be insulator)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(fabric, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(silk, be insulator)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fabric, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(silk, be insulator)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(fabric, is good insulators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(silk, be insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(wool, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(wool, is good insulator)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(wool, be better insulator than cotton)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(silk, be insulator)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(silk, is good insulator)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(silk, is good insulator)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(silk, is good insulator)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(silk, is good insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(silk, be insulator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(silk, be insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(fabric, is insulator)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fabric, be insulator)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fabric, is good insulator)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(fabric, is good insulators)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(wool, is good insulator)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(fabric, is insulator)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fabric, be insulator)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fabric, is good insulator)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(silk, be insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(fabric, is good insulators)