wool: be better insulator than cotton

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fabric
Weight: 0.70
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, commodity
Weight: 0.65
, fiber
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cashmere
Weight: 0.56
, shetland
Weight: 0.49
, tweed
Weight: 0.45
, silk
Weight: 0.37
, cotton
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better insulator than cotton 1.00
be better than cotton 0.88
be good insulator 0.87
is good insulator 0.87
be warmer than cotton 0.86
be good insulator of heat 0.86
be more expensive than cotton 0.85
be better than polyester 0.81
be better than wool 0.80
be mixed with cotton 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(fabric, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fabric, be good insulator)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wool, be better insulator than cotton)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fabric, be good insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(fabric, is good insulator)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fabric, is good insulator)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(fabric, be good insulator)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(silk, be better than cotton)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silk, be more expensive than cotton)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cotton, is good insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, be better than wool)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(silk, is good insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(cotton, be better than wool)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(fabric, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fabric, be good insulator)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(wool, be better insulator than cotton)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(silk, be better than cotton)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(silk, be better than cotton)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(silk, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(silk, be more expensive than cotton)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(silk, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(silk, is good insulator)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cotton, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(cotton, is good insulator)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(cotton, be better than wool)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(cotton, be better than wool)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(cashmere, be better than wool)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cashmere, be better than wool)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(wool, be better insulator than cotton)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(wool, be better than cotton)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(wool, be warmer than cotton)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(wool, be good insulator)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(wool, is good insulator)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(wool, be mixed with cotton)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(wool, be better than cotton)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(wool, be better than cotton)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(wool, be warmer than cotton)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(wool, be warmer than cotton)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wool, be mixed with cotton)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(wool, is good insulator)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(wool, is good insulator)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(wool, be good insulator)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(wool, be good insulator)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(wool, be mixed with cotton)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(wool, is good insulator)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(wool, be good insulator)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(wool, be warmer than cotton)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better than cotton)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(wool, be mixed with cotton)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wool, be better insulator than cotton)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fabric, be good insulator)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fabric, is good insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(silk, be better than cotton)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(silk, be more expensive than cotton)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cashmere, be better than wool)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(silk, is good insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cotton, is good insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cotton, be better than wool)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fabric, be good insulator)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fabric, is good insulator)