wool: be better than cotton

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fabric
Weight: 0.70
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, commodity
Weight: 0.65
, fiber
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cashmere
Weight: 0.56
, shetland
Weight: 0.49
, tweed
Weight: 0.45
, silk
Weight: 0.37
, cotton
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than cotton 1.00
be more expensive than cotton 0.95
be warmer than cotton 0.93
be better insulator than cotton 0.88
be mixed with cotton 0.88
was prepared before cotton gin 0.85
be processed into cotton balls 0.84
be better than wool 0.84
be more important than jute 0.82
be better than other fabrics 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(silk, be better than cotton)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silk, be more expensive than cotton)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, be better than wool)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(cotton, be better than wool)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(silk, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(silk, be better than cotton)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(silk, be more expensive than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(silk, be more expensive than cotton)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(cotton, be better than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(cotton, be better than wool)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(cashmere, be better than wool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cashmere, be better than wool)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(wool, be better than cotton)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(wool, be mixed with cotton)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(wool, be warmer than cotton)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(wool, be warmer than cotton)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wool, be mixed with cotton)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(wool, be mixed with cotton)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(wool, be warmer than cotton)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(wool, be warmer than cotton)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(wool, be mixed with cotton)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better than cotton)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(wool, be better than cotton)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(silk, be better than cotton)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(silk, be more expensive than cotton)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cashmere, be better than wool)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better than cotton) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cotton, be better than wool)