wool: be more expensive than cotton

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fabric
Weight: 0.70
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, commodity
Weight: 0.65
, fiber
Weight: 0.63
Siblings cashmere
Weight: 0.56
, shetland
Weight: 0.49
, tweed
Weight: 0.45
, silk
Weight: 0.37
, cotton
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than cotton 1.00
be better than cotton 0.95
be warmer than cotton 0.91
be better insulator than cotton 0.85
be mixed with cotton 0.84
be processed into cotton balls 0.84
was prepared before cotton gin 0.82
be more important than jute 0.81
be less resistant than fabric 0.81
be better than other fabrics 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silk, be more expensive than cotton)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(silk, be better than cotton)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(silk, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(silk, be more expensive than cotton)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(silk, be better than cotton)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(silk, be better than cotton)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(wool, be more expensive than cotton)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(wool, be better than cotton)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(wool, be warmer than cotton)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(wool, be mixed with cotton)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(wool, be better than cotton)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(wool, be better than cotton)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(wool, be warmer than cotton)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(wool, be warmer than cotton)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wool, be mixed with cotton)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(wool, be mixed with cotton)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better than cotton)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(wool, be warmer than cotton)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(wool, be better insulator than cotton)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(wool, be mixed with cotton)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wool, be more expensive than cotton)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(wool, be more expensive than cotton)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(silk, be more expensive than cotton)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wool, be more expensive than cotton)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(silk, be better than cotton)