face: face communication important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents target
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
, sign
Weight: 0.59
, body part
Weight: 0.59
Siblings eye socket
Weight: 0.48
, blush
Weight: 0.42
, spud
Weight: 0.35
, smack
Weight: 0.34
, stop sign
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
face communication important 1.00
face communication 0.98
face communication effective 0.94
face communication most effective 0.93
be important in communication 0.92
face interaction better 0.85
face interaction 0.85
need communicate 0.81
face conversation important 0.81
has physical part face 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(sign, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(face, face communication important)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(body part, need communicate)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(face, face communication important)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(sign, be important in communication)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(body part, need communicate)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(sign, be important in communication)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(body part, need communicate)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(sign, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(face, face communication important)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(body part, need communicate)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(face, face communication important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(face, face communication important)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(face, face communication)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(face, face communication)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(face, face communication)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(face, face communication)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(face, face communication most effective)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(face, face communication most effective)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(face, face interaction better)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(face, has physical part face)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(face, face interaction better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(face, face communication most effective)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(face, face communication most effective)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(face, face interaction better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(face, face interaction better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(face, has physical part face)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(face, face conversation important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(face, has physical part face)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(face, has physical part face)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(face, face conversation important)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(face, face conversation important)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(face, face conversation important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(face, face communication important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(face, face communication important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(body part, need communicate)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(sign, be important in communication)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(body part, need communicate)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(face, face communication important)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(sign, be important in communication)