factory: be harmful to environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturing
Weight: 0.66
, facility
Weight: 0.66
, plant
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
, structure
Weight: 0.59
Siblings brewery
Weight: 0.57
, tannery
Weight: 0.47
, power plant
Weight: 0.36
, warehouse
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harmful to environment 1.00
be bad for environment 0.86
poison environment 0.81
affect climate 0.77
affect ecosystems 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(factory, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(factory, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(power plant, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(power plant, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(factory, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(factory, be harmful to environment)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(factory, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(factory, be bad for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(factory, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(factory, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(factory, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(factory, be bad for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(factory, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(factory, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(factory, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(factory, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(factory, be harmful to environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(factory, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(factory, be harmful to environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(factory, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(power plant, be bad for environment)