factory: contribute to global warming

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturing
Weight: 0.66
, facility
Weight: 0.66
, plant
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
, structure
Weight: 0.59
Siblings brewery
Weight: 0.57
, tannery
Weight: 0.47
, power plant
Weight: 0.36
, warehouse
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
contribute to global warming 1.00
affect global warming 0.95
have effect on global warming 0.90
affect climate 0.77
be in developing countries 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(factory, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(power plant, contribute to global warming)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(factory, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(power plant, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(power plant, contribute to global warming)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(factory, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(factory, contribute to global warming)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(factory, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(factory, have effect on global warming)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(factory, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(factory, have effect on global warming)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(factory, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(factory, have effect on global warming)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(factory, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(factory, be in developing countries)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(factory, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(factory, have effect on global warming)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(factory, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(factory, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(factory, contribute to global warming)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(factory, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(factory, contribute to global warming)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(factory, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(power plant, contribute to global warming)