power plant: contribute to global warming

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.77
, plant
Weight: 0.73
, utility
Weight: 0.68
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.70
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.69
, hydro
Weight: 0.68
, power
Weight: 0.67
, turbine
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
contribute to global warming 1.00
contribute to pollution 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(power plant, contribute to global warming)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(power plant, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(power plant, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(power plant, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(power plant, contribute to global warming)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(power plant, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(power plant, contribute to global warming)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(power plant, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(power plant, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(power plant, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(power plant, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(power plant, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(power plant, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(power plant, contribute to global warming)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(power plant, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(power plant, contribute to global warming)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(power plant, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(power plant, contribute to global warming)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)