power plant: contribute to pollution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.77
, plant
Weight: 0.73
, utility
Weight: 0.68
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.70
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.69
, hydro
Weight: 0.68
, power
Weight: 0.67
, turbine
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
contribute to pollution 1.00
contribute to thermal pollution 0.90
be source of pollution 0.88
reduce effects of thermal pollution 0.83
pollute environment 0.82
be source of thermal pollution 0.82
emit percentage of pollutants 0.81
emit high percentage of pollutants 0.81
contribute to global warming 0.76
emit less greenhouse gases 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(nuclear power plant, emit less greenhouse gases)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(power plant, contribute to pollution)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, emit less greenhouse gases)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, emit less greenhouse gases)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(nuclear power plant, emit less greenhouse gases)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(power plant, contribute to pollution)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(power plant, emit percentage of pollutants)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(power plant, emit high percentage of pollutants)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(power plant, be source of pollution)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(power plant, contribute to global warming)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(power plant, contribute to global warming)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(power plant, contribute to global warming)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(power plant, be source of pollution)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be source of pollution)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(power plant, contribute to global warming)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(power plant, emit percentage of pollutants)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(power plant, be source of pollution)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(power plant, emit high percentage of pollutants)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(power plant, emit percentage of pollutants)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(power plant, emit high percentage of pollutants)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(power plant, emit high percentage of pollutants)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(power plant, emit percentage of pollutants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(power plant, contribute to pollution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, emit less greenhouse gases)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, emit less greenhouse gases)