power plant: be source of pollution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.77
, plant
Weight: 0.73
, utility
Weight: 0.68
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.70
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.69
, hydro
Weight: 0.68
, power
Weight: 0.67
, turbine
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be source of pollution 1.00
be source of thermal pollution 0.91
contribute to pollution 0.88
contribute to thermal pollution 0.83
reduce effects of thermal pollution 0.81
pollute environment 0.79
emit percentage of pollutants 0.79
emit high percentage of pollutants 0.79
be considered nonrenewable energy source 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(power plant, be source of pollution)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(power plant, be source of pollution)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(power plant, be source of pollution)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(power plant, be source of pollution)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(power plant, be source of pollution)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(power plant, be source of pollution)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(power plant, be source of pollution)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(nuclear power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(power plant, be source of pollution)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(power plant, be source of pollution)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(power plant, emit percentage of pollutants)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(power plant, emit high percentage of pollutants)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be source of thermal pollution)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(power plant, emit percentage of pollutants)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(power plant, emit high percentage of pollutants)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(power plant, emit percentage of pollutants)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(power plant, emit high percentage of pollutants)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(power plant, emit high percentage of pollutants)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(power plant, emit percentage of pollutants)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be source of pollution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(power plant, be source of pollution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be considered nonrenewable energy source)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(power plant, be source of pollution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)