nuclear power plant: contribute to pollution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plant
Weight: 0.85
, power plant
Weight: 0.72
, facility
Weight: 0.71
, power
Weight: 0.71
, chemical
Weight: 0.68
Siblings chemical plant
Weight: 0.40
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.40
, water plant
Weight: 0.38
, hydro
Weight: 0.37
, nuclear fission
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
contribute to pollution 1.00
contribute to thermal pollution 0.90
reduce effects of pollution 0.87
reduce effects of thermal pollution 0.83
emit less greenhouse gases 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of pollution)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of pollution)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of pollution)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of pollution)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, emit less greenhouse gases)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(nuclear power plant, emit less greenhouse gases)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, emit less greenhouse gases)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, emit less greenhouse gases)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(power plant, contribute to pollution)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(power plant, contribute to pollution)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(power plant, contribute to thermal pollution)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(nuclear power plant, contribute to pollution)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, reduce effects of thermal pollution)