factory: were dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturing
Weight: 0.66
, facility
Weight: 0.66
, plant
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
, structure
Weight: 0.59
Siblings brewery
Weight: 0.57
, tannery
Weight: 0.47
, power plant
Weight: 0.36
, warehouse
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
were dangerous 1.00
is dangerous 0.94
be dangerous place work in 0.85
were needed 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(factory, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(factory, were dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(factory, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(factory, is dangerous)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(factory, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(factory, is dangerous)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(factory, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(factory, be dangerous place work in)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(factory, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(factory, be dangerous place work in)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(factory, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(factory, were needed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(factory, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(factory, be dangerous place work in)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(factory, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(factory, be dangerous place work in)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(factory, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(factory, is dangerous)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(factory, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(factory, is dangerous)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(factory, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(factory, were needed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(factory, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(factory, were needed)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(factory, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(factory, were needed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(factory, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factory, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(factory, were dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(factory, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factory, were dangerous)