factory: were needed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturing
Weight: 0.66
, facility
Weight: 0.66
, plant
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
, structure
Weight: 0.59
Siblings brewery
Weight: 0.57
, tannery
Weight: 0.47
, power plant
Weight: 0.36
, warehouse
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
were needed 1.00
need water 0.77
were dangerous 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(plant, need water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(factory, were needed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(factory, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(plant, need water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(factory, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(plant, need water)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(factory, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(power plant, need water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(plant, need water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(factory, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(factory, were needed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(factory, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(power plant, need water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(power plant, need water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(factory, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(factory, were needed)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(factory, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(factory, need water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(factory, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(factory, were dangerous)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(factory, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(factory, need water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(factory, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(factory, were dangerous)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(factory, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(factory, need water)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(factory, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(factory, were dangerous)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(factory, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(factory, need water)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(factory, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factory, were dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(factory, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(factory, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(factory, were needed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(factory, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(factory, were needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(factory, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(plant, need water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(factory, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(power plant, need water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(factory, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(plant, need water)